Home > Authors > Roxburghe, James Innes-Ker Duke of > Pet.�Duke of Roxburghe against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutors
Pet.�Duke of Roxburghe against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutors
Recent activity
Rate this book to see your activity here.
4 Books Similar to Pet.�Duke of Roxburghe against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutors by Roxburghe, James Innes-Ker Duke of
Bookscovery readers who liked Pet.�Duke of Roxburghe against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutors also like
In the House of Lords, Brigadier-General Walter Ker of Littledean, claiming right to the titles and honours of Duke of Roxburghe, &c., and Richard Hotchkis, Esq, writer to the signet, his attorney, appellants Sir James Norcliffe Innes, baronet, and James Horne, Esq, writer to the signet his commissioner, John Bellenden Ker, Henry Gawler, and John Seton Karr, Esquires, respondents John Bellenden Ker, Henry Gawler and John Seton Karr, Esquires, appellants, Brigadier-General Walter Ker, and Richard Hotchkins, Esq, Sir James Norcliffe Innes, baronet, and James Horne, Esq, respondents, In the House of Lords, Roxburghe cause, (question relating to the feus.) John Bellenden Ker, Esquire, appellant, His Grace James Duke of Roxburghe, respondent and Cases decided in the Court of Session, &c., reported by Norman Macpherson, Robert Lee, Andrew B. Bell, Middleton Rettie, and Alex. S. Kinnear, Esquires, advocates, Longworth or Yelverton v. Yelverton, and Yelverton v. Longworth, December 19, 1862.
How many of these have you read?
Comments and reviews of Pet.�Duke of Roxburghe against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutors
Please sign in to leave a comment